Snapt vs AutoSlip

Same problem. Different product.

Both scan receipts into YNAB. Snapt is the conversational one — browser or Telegram, your exact categories, nothing syncs until you say so.

  • Chat to fix splits in plain English — not just a form
  • Browser and Telegram (@usesnapt_bot), same assistant
  • Receipt images processed then deleted — we don’t keep a 90-day pile
  • Built for Couples Mode and real multi-category hell (Costco, Amazon PDFs)

Works in your browser or Telegram · 5 free receipts · No credit card

If you’re evaluating AutoSlip, check these differences

AutoSlip markets itself as a “Receipt Scanner for YNAB” with photo upload or email forwarding to an @autoslip.ai address, paper/online plans around $3–$5/mo, and a 7-day trial (per their site). Snapt solves the same YNAB pain with a different workflow: one conversation in the browser or Telegram, line-item splits against your real categories, and an explicit approve step before anything hits YNAB.

Where Snapt pulls ahead

Telegram at checkout. Same bot as the web dashboard — snap in line, tweak later. Conversational edits. “Move the Advil to Health” beats hunting menus. Privacy posture. Snapt’s product promise is process-and-delete for receipt images. AutoSlip’s FAQ states receipt files are deleted after 90 days — meaning they retain them for a period. If that matters to you, compare policies side by side. Couples and Amazon. Plus includes Couples Mode and PDF invoices (Amazon) so partners and online orders don’t become weekend homework.

Pricing at a glance (verify live)

Snapt: five free receipts (no card), then Lite / Plus / Pro from the homepage pricing. AutoSlip: 7-day free trial; Paper $3/mo, Online $3/mo, Both $5/mo (per autoslip.ai). Numbers change — always confirm on each site before you subscribe.

Try Snapt on your next Costco run

The fastest way to decide isn’t a feature matrix — it’s one ugly receipt. Start free, process a real multi-category ticket, and see whether the chat-and-approve flow feels like your YNAB brain.

Snapt vs AutoSlip

FeatureSnaptAutoSlip
CaptureBrowser upload + Telegram botPhoto upload + email forward to @autoslip.ai (per their site)
Review UXConversational — plain-English adjustmentsReview & sync UI; optional auto-push (per their FAQ)
YNAB writeNothing syncs until you approve in SnaptReview before sync; can enable auto-push; YNAB may mark needs approval
Receipt image retentionProcessed, then deleted (product privacy promise)Deleted after 90 days (per their FAQ)
Amazon / PDFsPlus and ProOnline/email receipt plans — confirm current PDF support on their site
Trial5 free receipts, no credit card7-day free trial, no credit card (per their site)

Competitor details can change — verify on their site before you decide.

FAQ

Is Snapt a copy of AutoSlip?

Snapt is its own product: YNAB-native splits with a browser + Telegram chat workflow. Feature sets in this niche look similar because the problem (Costco/Amazon → YNAB) is the same. Compare capture method, review UX, retention policy, and couples/Amazon needs — then try both trials.

Why would I pick Snapt over AutoSlip?

If you want Telegram + web as one conversation, plain-English edits, process-and-delete receipt images, and Couples/Amazon PDF workflows on higher plans, start with Snapt’s free receipts.

Does Snapt auto-push to YNAB without asking?

No. You review and approve in Snapt before a split transaction syncs.

Your next receipt, already split.

Try Snapt free — five receipts, no card required.